Volume 5 • Issue 1 | March 2021

Impact of epidemics and pandemics on consumption pattern: evidence from Covid-19 pandemic in rural-urban India

Rahul Kumar, Md. Shahnawaz Abdin

Abstract:

Purpose – The present world is crippled with the pandemic coronavirus (Covid-19). The pandemic that originated in Wuhan city of China has sent every country in the world in an unprecedented situation that has social and economic impacts. This paper aims to explore whether epidemics and pandemics have any impact on consumption patterns among rural and urban consumers in India. Taking pandemic Covid-19 as a case study, it was explored how this pandemic impacted the consumption pattern of consumers in India; what are the similarities and/or differences between rural and urban consumers that are found in their consumption habits in the wake of Covid-19 pandemic.

Design/methodology/approach – The required data was collected through questionnaires sent to respondents. Approximately 500 respondents were contacted through the mail to fill in the survey questionnaire. Despite the sincere efforts, a total of 175 complete survey questionnaires were filled in by respondents. The study used SPSS Statistics version 25 software for the analysis of data.

Findings – It was found that epidemics and pandemics have a profound impact on the pattern of consumption in India. The study reveals that consumers resort to panic buying in the initial stages of epidemics and pandemics. It was found that consumption habits of consumers went a sea change and they were spending largely on essentials only. The study also reveals that the majority of consumers would like to continue in the same consumption habits as that of during COVID-19. The consumption pattern of urban consumers witnessed more change than the consumption pattern of rural consumers. It is due to the closure of eateries and restaurants, shopping malls, movie theatres, etc., in urban areas that forced the change in the consumption pattern of urban consumers.

Research limitations/implications – The research has a limitation of using a less sample size. For the generalizations, more robust studies can be conducted with more data.

Practical implications – The findings of the study will give marketers an insight for framing their policies in the wake of epidemics and pandemics.

Originality/value – The research adds to the existing body of knowledge. There are plenty of studies on the behaviour of consumers. However, there are no major studies that focus on the behaviour of consumers during the outbreak of a pandemic. So, this study fills this gap in the existing body of knowledge.

References:

  1. Accenture (2020), available at: www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-123/Accenture-COVID19-Pulse-Survey-Research-PoV.pdf#zoom=40
  2. AliA. and AlharbiM.L.O. (2020), “COVID-19: disease, management, treatment, and social impact”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 728 No. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138861.
  3. BakerS.R.FarrokhniaR.A.MeyerS.PagelM. and YannelisC. (2020), “How does household spending respond to an epidemic? Consumption during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic”, available at: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/BFI_WP_202030.pdf
  4. BloomD.E. and CanningD. (2006), “Epidemics and economics”, available at: https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1288/2013/10/BLOOM_CANNINGWP9.2006.pdf
  5. BounieD.CamaraY. and GalbraithJ.W. (2020), “The COVID-19 containment seen through French consumer transaction data: expenditures, mobility and online substitution”, available at: https://voxeu.org/article/tracking-covid-19-consumption-shock-card-transactions
  6. ChakrabortyI. and MaityP. (2020), “COVID-19 outbreak: migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 728 No. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882.
  7. ChenH.QianW. and WenQ. (2020), “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on consumption: learning from high frequency transaction data”, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3568574
  8. ChronopoulosD.K.LukasM. and WilsonJ.O.S. (2020), “Real-time consumer spending responses to the COVID-19 crisis and government lockdown”, available at: https://voxeu.org/article/real-time-consumer-spending-responses-lockdown
  9. DixonS.McDonaldS. and RobertsJ. (2002), “The impact of HIV and AIDS on Africa’s economic development”, available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7331.232
  10. FanV.Y.JamisonD.T. and SummersL.H. (2016), “The inclusive cost of pandemic influenza risk”, available at: www.nber.org/paper/w22137
  11. GarretT.A. (2007), “Economic effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic: implications for a modern-day pandemic”, available at: www.stlouisfed.org/∼/media/files/pdfs/community-development/research-reports/pandemic_flu_report.pdf
  12. IBM (2020), “COVID-19 is significantly altering US consumer behaviour and plans post-crisis”, available at: https://newsroom.ibm.com/2020-05-01-IBM-Study-COVID-19-Is-Significantly-Altering-U-S-Consumer-Behavior-and-Plans-Post-Crisis?printable
  13. JonasO.B. (2013), “Pandemic risk”, World Development Reportavailable at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/16343/WDR14_bp_Pandemic_Risk_Jonas.pdf?sequence=1
  14. KarlssonM.NilssonT. and PichlerS. (2013), “The impact of the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic on economic performance in Sweden: an investigation into the consequences of an extraordinary mortality shock”, available at: http://conference.iza.org/conference_files/SUMS_2013/pichler_s6888.pdf
  15. McKibbinW.J. and SidorenkoA.A. (2006), “Global macroeconomic consequences of pandemic influenza”, available at: https://cama.crawford.anu.edu.au/pdf/working-papers/2006/262006.pdf
  16. McKinsey and Company (2020), “Consumer sentiment is evolving as countries around the world begin to reopen”, available at: www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/a-global-view-of-how-consumer-behavior-is-changing-amid-covi%E2%80%A6
  17. MuellbauerJ. (2020), “The coronavirus pandemic and US consumption. CEPR policy portal”, available at: https://voxeu.org/article/coronavirus-pandemic-and-us-consumption
  18. OrsetC. (2018), “People’s perception and cost-effectiveness of home confinement during an influenza pandemic: evidence from the French case”, The European Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 19 No. 9, pp. 1335-1350.
  19. SaeidaS.RawtaniD. and HussainC.M. (2020), “Environmental perspective of COVID-19”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 728 No. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138870.
  20. SandsP.TurabiA.E.SaynischP.A. and DzauV.J. (2016), “Assessment of economic vulnerability to infectious disease crises”, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30594-3.
  21. SharmaS.ZhangM.GaoA.J.ZhangH. and KotaS.H. (2020), “Effect of restricted emissions during COVID-19 on air quality in India”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 728 No. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138878.
  22. ShethJ. (2020), “Impact of COVID-19 on consumer behaviour: will the old habits return or die?”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 117 No. 2020, pp. 280-283, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.059.
  23. SuricoP.KanzigD. and HaciogluS. (2020), “Consumption in the time of COVID-19: evidence from UK transaction data”, Working Paperavailable at: https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/news/FreeDP_14May.pdf
  24. World Economic Forum (2018), available at: www.weforum.org/agenda/2www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/05/how-epidemics-infect-the-global-economy-and-what-to-do-about-it/
  25. Zambrano-MonserrateM.A.RuonoM.R. and AlcaldeL.S. (2020), “Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 728 No. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813.
  1. Further reading

  1. World Economic Forum (2020), available at: www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Chief_Economists_Outlook_April_2020.pdf