Volume 6 • Number 1 | March 2022

Is it fair that advanced workers get paid disproportionally more: economic analysis

Olga Kosheleva, and Sean R. Aguilar

Abstract:

Purpose – On the one hand, everyone agrees that economics should be fair, that workers should get equal pay for equal work. Any instance of unfairness causes a strong disagreement. On the other hand, in many companies, advanced workers – who produce more than others – get paid disproportionally more for their work, and this does not seem to cause any negative feelings. In this paper, the authors analyze this situation from the economic viewpoint.

Design/methodology/approach – To analyze the problem, the authors use general mathematical models of how utility – and hence, decisions – depends on the pay-per-unit.

Findings – The authors show that from the economic viewpoint, additional payments for advanced workers indeed make economic sense, benefit everyone, and thus – in contrast to the naive literal interpretation of fairness – are not unfair. As a consequence of this analysis, the authors also explain why the labor share of the companies’ income is, on average, close to 50% – an empirical fact that, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, was never previously explained.

Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper that explains the empirical fact – that the labor share of the income is close to 50%.

References:

  1. Fishburn, P.C. (1969), Utility Theory for Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  2. Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, NY.
  3. Kosheleva, O. and Kreinovich, V. (2019), “How to assign points for chores”, Russian Digital Libraries Journal, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 759-761.
  4. Kreinovich, V. (2014), “Decision making under interval uncertainty (and beyond)”, in Guo, P. and Pedrycz, W. (Eds), Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences, Springer-Verlag, Cham, pp. 163-193.
  5. Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, R. (1989), Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey, Dover, New York, NY.
  6. Manyika, J., Mischke, J., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Krishnan, M. and Cudre, S. (2019), “A new look at the declining labor share of income in the United States”, McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco, CA, available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/a-new-look-at-the-declining-labor-share-of-income-in-the-united-states.
  7. Nguyen, H.T., Kosheleva, O. and Kreinovich, V. (2009), “Decision making beyond arrow's ‘impossibility theorem', with the analysis of effects of collusion and mutual attraction”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 27-47.
  8. Raiffa, H. (1997), Decision Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Columbus, OH.

JEL classification: DOI 10.1108/AJEB-06-2021-0079