Tạp chí đã xuất bản
2004
ISSN
ISSN 2615-9813
ISSN (số cũ) 1859-3682

Số 225 | Tháng 12/2024

Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến hành vi che giấu kiến thức của nhân viên trong lĩnh vực ngân hàng tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Nguyễn Kim Nam, Nguyễn Thị Hằng Nga

Tóm tắt:

Quản lý kiến thức ngày càng trở nên quan trọng trong hoạt động của các tổ chức. Trong đó hành vi che giấu kiến thức (CGKT) có thể gây ra các hậu quả bất lợi cho cá nhân và tổ chức. Tuy nhiên, các nghiên cứu về hành vi CGKT vẫn đang còn hạn chế. Do đó, mục tiêu của nghiên cứu này là xem xét các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến hành vi CGKT của nhân viên. Dữ liệu thu thập thông qua khảo sát 216 nhân viên ngành ngân hàng dựa trên phương pháp chọn mẫu thuận tiện. Nghiên cứu sử dụng phương pháp định lượng kết hợp với định tính. Kiểm định giả thuyết được thực hiện thông qua mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính bằng phần mềm SPSS và AMOS 20. Kết quả cho thấy có bốn yếu tố ảnh hưởng cùng chiều đến hành vi CGKT của nhân viên sắp xếp theo mức độ giảm dần là: (i) Thiếu hụt phần thưởng; (ii) Thiếu tin tưởng; (iii) Quyền sở hữu tâm lý; và (iv) Phức tạp của kiến thức. Nghiên cứu này đóng góp thêm vào lý thuyết quản trị kiến thức và hiểu biết sâu sắc hơn về hành vi CGKT của nhân viên trong ngành ngân hàng, một lĩnh vực được xem là thâm dụng kiến thức. Ngoài ra, nghiên cứu cũng cung cấp thêm bằng chứng hữu ích cho các nhà quản trị nhằm tìm cách hạn chế hành vi CGKT của nhân viên.

 

Tài liệu tham khảo:

  1. Abdelwhab Ali, A., Panneer selvam, D. D. D., Paris, L., & Gunasekaran, A. (2019). Key factors influencing knowledge sharing practices and its relationship with organizational performance within the oil and gas industry. Journal of Knowledge Management23(9), 1806-1837. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0394.
  2. Abubakar, A. M., Behravesh, E., Rezapouraghdam, H., & Yildiz, S. B. (2019). Applying artificial intelligence technique to predict knowledge hiding behavior. International Journal of Information Management, 49(March), 45–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.006.
  3. Alnaimi, A. M. M., & Rjoub, H. (2021). Perceived organizational support, psychological entitlement, and extra-role behavior: The mediating role of knowledge hiding behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(3), 507-522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.1.
  4. Anand, A., Centobelli, P., & Cerchione, R. (2020). Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding. Journal of Organizational Change Management33(2), 379-399. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2019-0174
  5. Anaza, N. A., & Nowlin, E. L. (2017). What's mine is mine: A study of salesperson knowledge withholding & hoarding behavior. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 14-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.03.007.
  6. Babič, K., Černe, M., Connelly, C. E., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2019). Are we in this together? Knowledge hiding in teams, collective prosocial motivation and leader-member exchange. Journal of Knowledge Management23(8), 1502-1522. doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0734. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0734.
  7. Banagou, M., Batistič, S., Do, H., & Poell, R. F. (2021). Relational climates moderate the effect of openness to experience on knowledge hiding: A two-country multi-level study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(11), 60-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0613.
  8. Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and Power in Social Life, Routledge.
  9. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  10. Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 172–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0122.
  11. Connelly, C. E., & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 479-489. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.931325.
  12. Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33,64–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.737.
  13. Duan, Y., Yang, M., Huang, L., Chin, T., Fiano, F., de Nuccio, E., & Zhou, L. (2022). Unveiling the impacts of explicit vs. tacit knowledge hiding on innovation quality: The moderating role of knowledge flow within a firm. Journal of Business Research139, 1489-1500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.068.
  14. El-Kassar, A. N., Dagher, G. K., Lythreatis, S., & Azakir, M. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance. Journal of Business Research140, 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.079.
  15. Fauzi, M. A. (2023). Knowledge hiding behavior in higher education institutions: a scientometric analysis and systematic literature review approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 302-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2021-0527.
  16. Fong, P. S. W., Men, C., Luo, J., & Jia, R. (2018). Knowledge hiding and team creativity: The contingent role of task interdependence. Management Decision, 56(2), 329–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2016-0778.
  17. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) ‘Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error’, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp. 39–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
  18. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623.
  19. Gürlek, M. (2020). Antecedents of knowledge hiding in organizations: A study on knowledge workers. Economics Business and Organization Research, 20-32.
  20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E.  (2014). Multivariate data analysis. London, UK: Pearson.
  21. Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of management40(5), 1334-1364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130.
  22. Inegbedion, H. E., Sajuyigbe, A., Osifo, S., & Imohiosen, D. (2023). Predictors of knowledge hiding and organisational success: empirical evidence from Nigeria. Current Psychology, 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05099-7.
  23. Iqbal, M. S., Ishaq, M. A., Akram, A., & Habibah, U. (2020). Personality traits predicting knowledge hiding behaviour: Empirical evidence from academic institutions of Pakistan. Business Information Review, 37(4), 154-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821209693.
  24. Javaid, J., Soroya, S., & Mahmood, K. (2020). Impact of personal and organizational factors on knowledge sharing attitude of university teachers in Pakistan. The Electronic Library, 38 (2), 317-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2019-0121.
  25. Kaushal, S., & Nyoni, A. M. (2022). Why do rewards fail to motivate knowledge sharing behavior among employees?. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, (ahead-of-print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2022-0202
  26. Kim, N. N., & Hang, N. N. T. (2024). The relationship between knowledge-oriented leadership, conflict, and knowledge hiding: empirical research in banking. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development. 14(3), 249-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2024.141629.
  27. Kumar Jha, J., & Varkkey, B. (2018). Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: evidence from the Indian R&D professionals. Journal of Knowledge Management22(4), 824-849. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2017-0048.
  28. Kumar, S. S., Kang, S., & Kishore, R. (2020). Examining workplace incivility as an antecedent of Knowledge hiding behaviour. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(5), 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.5.27.
  29. Li, J., Yuan, L., Ning, L., & Li-Ying, J. (2015). Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1146–1166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0043.
  30. Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of information science33(2), 135-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515060681.
  31. Long, J., Liu, H., & Shen, Z. (2024). Narcissistic rivalry and admiration and knowledge hiding: mediating roles of emotional exhaustion and interpersonal trust. Journal of Knowledge Management28(1), 1-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2022-0860.
  32. Nguyen Kim, N., & Nguyen Thi Hang, N. (2024). Rewards, knowledge sharing and individual work performance: an empirical study. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2359372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2359372.
  33. Nguyen, N. K., & Nguyen, N. T. H. (2024a). Creativity and service innovation in the banking sector: The role of knowledge acquisition and knowledge provision. Journal of General Management, (ahead-of-print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231225601.
  34. Nguyen, N. K., & Nguyen, N. T. H. ̀. (2024b). The relationship between conscientiousness, openness to experience, knowledge-hiding behavior and job performance of employees. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, (ahead-of-print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2024-0003.
  35. Nguyen, T. M., & Malik, A. (2020). Cognitive processes, rewards and online knowledge sharing behaviour: the moderating effect of organisational innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(6), 1241-1261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2019-0742.
  36. Nguyen, T. M., Malik, A., & Budhwar, P. (2022). Knowledge hiding in organizational crisis: The moderating role of leadership. Journal of Business Research, 139, 161-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.026.
  37. Peng, H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge?. Journal of knowledge management, 17(3), 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2012-0380.
  38. Peng, H. (2012). Counterproductive work behavior among Chinese knowledge workers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(2), 119–138. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00586.x.
  39. Peng, J., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. (2019). Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. Journal of Business Ethics159, 419-433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3799-0.
  40. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028.
  41. Rezaei, M., Sadraei, R., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., & Vrontis, D. (2023). Knowledge is of no value unless to be shared. A synthesis of knowledge-sharing drivers in born-globals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09896-3.
  42. Scuotto, V., Nespoli, C., Tran, P. T., & Cappiello, G. (2022). An alternative way to predict knowledge hiding: The lens of transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research140, 76-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.045.
  43. Shahreki, J., Ganesan, J., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Personality traits and individual performance: test of the mediating role of motivation among top management. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics14(3), 225-249. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2020.108087.
  44. Singh, S. K. (2019). Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding. Journal of Business Research, 97, 10-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.034.
  45. Skerlavaj, M., Černe, M., & Batistič, S. (2023). Knowledge Hiding in Organizations: Meta-Analysis 10 Years Later. Economic and Business Review, 25(2), 79-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1319.
  46. Sulistiawan, J., Moslehpour, M., Diana, F., & Lin, P. K. (2022). Why and when do employees hide their knowledge?. Behavioral sciences12(2), 56. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020056.
  47. Venz, L., & Nesher Shoshan, H. (2022). Be smart, play dumb? A transactional perspective on day-specific knowledge hiding, interpersonal conflict, and psychological strain. Human Relations75(1), 113-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726721990438.
  48. Wen, J., & Ma, R. (2021). Antecedents of knowledge hiding and their impact on organizational performance. Frontiers in psychology12, 796976. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796976.
  49. Xiao, M., & Cooke, F. L. (2019). Why and when knowledge hiding in the workplace is harmful: A review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(4), 470–502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12198.
  50. Yam, K. C., Klotz, A. C., He, W., & Reynolds, S. J. (2017). From good soldiers to psychologically entitled: Examining when and why citizenship behavior leads to deviance. Academy of Management Journal, 60(8), 373–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0234.
  51. Yuan, Y., Yang, L., Cheng, X., & Wei, J. (2021). What is bullying hiding? Exploring antecedents and potential dimension of knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management25(5), 1146-1169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0256.
  52. Zaremohzzabieh, Z., & Mohd Rasdi, R. (2023). Revisiting the determinants of knowledge-sharing behavior in organizations: a meta-analytic structural equation model application. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, (ahead-of-print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0034.
  53. Zhao, H., Xia, Q., He, P., Sheard, G., & Wan, P. (2016). Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management59, 84-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.009.


Factors Affecting Knowledge-Hiding Behaviour of Employees in the Banking Sector in Ho Chi Minh City

Abstract:

Knowledge management has increasingly become a priority in many organizations. Knowledge-hiding behaviour, in particular, can adversely affect individuals and organizations, yet research on this behaviour remains limited. This study aims to examine the factors influencing employees' knowledge-hiding behaviour. Data were collected through a survey of 216 bank employees, employing a convenience sampling method. The study utilized a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative research techniques. Hypothesis testing was conducted using structural equation modelling via SPSS and AMOS 20. The results indicate that four factors positively influence knowledge-hiding behaviour, ranked in descending order of impact: lack of rewards, lack of trust, psychological ownership, and knowledge complexity. This research contributes to the knowledge management theory by providing deeper insights into knowledge-hiding behaviour among employees in knowledge-intensive sectors like banking. Additionally, the study offers valuable evidence for managers seeking to reduce knowledge-hiding behaviour in the workplace.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63065/ajeb.vn.2024.225.106604

Liên hệ
  • Cơ quan chủ quản: Trường Đại học Ngân hàng Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

    Cơ quan xuất bản: Tạp chí Kinh tế và Ngân hàng châu Á

  • Địa chỉ Tòa soạn: 36 Tôn Thất Đạm, Phường Nguyễn Thái Bình, Quận 1, TP.HCM, Việt Nam
  • Điện thoại: 028.38210238|Email: [email protected]
  • Giấy phép trang thông tin điện tử: Số 201/GP-TTĐT do Cục Phát thanh, Truyền hình và Thông tin điện tử cấp ngày 11/11/2016
  • Giấy phép Hoạt động Tạp chí in: 388/GP-BTTTT ngày 02/11/2018 in tại Công ty TNHH Một Thành viên In Kinh tế
  • Tổng Biên tập: ..........................................................
Thể lệ tạp chí
Thống kê
  • 1.351 lượt truy cập
  • 30 trực tuyến
  • 207 Tạp chí đã được phát hành
  • 827 Bài viết được phát hành