Tạp chí đã xuất bản
2004
ISSN
ISSN 2615-9813
ISSN (số cũ) 1859-3682

SỐ 213 | Tháng 12/2023

Ảnh hưởng của bất định tỷ giá hối đoái đến đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngoài theo phương pháp tiếp cận Bayes

Lê Thông Tiến, Phạm Thị Tuyết Trinh, Nguyễn Minh Sáng

Tóm tắt:

Nghiên cứu kiểm tra ảnh hưởng của bất định tỷ giá hối đoái (TGHĐ) đến đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngoài (FDI) ở nhóm quốc gia theo chế độ tỷ giá neo mềm và nhóm quốc gia theo chế độ tỷ giá thả nổi với bộ dữ liệu bao gồm 114 quốc gia trong giai đoạn 2000 đến 2021 bằng phương pháp Bayes cho mô hình hiệu ứng ngẫu nhiên. Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy, ảnh hưởng của bất định TGHĐ đến FDI chủ yếu là cùng chiều với xác suất cao (94%-95%) ở nhóm quốc gia có chế độ tỷ giá neo mềm. Đối với các quốc gia có chế độ tỷ giá thả nổi, ảnh hưởng của bất định TGHĐ đến FDI vẫn là cùng chiều nhưng yếu hơn so với nhóm các quốc gia có chế độ tỷ giá neo mềm với xác suất ảnh hưởng cùng chiều của bất định TGHĐ dao động từ 88% đến 90%. Do đó, lý thuyết về sự Linh hoạt của sản xuất vẫn được ủng hộ mạnh mẽ hơn lý thuyết Lo ngại rủi ro. Sự khác biệt giữa hai chế độ TGHĐ được thể hiện ở mức độ phổ biến của xác suất ảnh hưởng cùng chiều của bất định TGHĐ.

 

Tài liệu tham khảo:

  1. Bacchetta, P., & Wincoop, E. V. (1998). Does Exchange Rate Stability Increase Trade and Capital Flows?. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 6704. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6704
  2. Balaban, S., Živkov, D., & Milenković, I. (2019). Impact of an Unexplained Component of Real Exchange Rate Volatility on FDI: Evidence from Transition Countries. Economic Systems, 43(3–4), 100719. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2019.100719 
  3. Block, J. H., Jaskiewicz, P., & Miller, D. (2011). Ownership versus management effects on performance in family and founder companies: A Bayesian reconciliation. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(4), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.10.001
  4. Darby, J., Hallett, A. H., Ireland, J., & Piscitelli., L. (1999). The Impact of Exchange rate volatility on the Level of Investment. Economic Journal, 109(454), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00416
  5. Darvas, Z. (2021). Timely Measurement of Real Effective Exchange Rates. Working Paper, 15, Bruegel. http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/103769
  6. Fernandez-Arias, E. (1996). The New Wave of Private Capital Inflows: Push or Pull?. Journal of Development Economics, 48, 389–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(95)00041-0
  7. Furceri, D., & Borelli, S. (2008). Foreign Direct Investments and Exchange Rate Volatility in the EMU Neighbourhood Countries. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 1(1), 42–59. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1215200
  8. Ghosh, A. R., Qureshi, M. S., Kim, J. I., & Zalduendo, J. (2014). Surges. Journal of International Economics, 92(2), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.12.007
  9. Harms, P., & Knaze, J. (2021). Bilateral De-Jure Exchange Rate Regimes and Foreign Direct Investment: A Gravity Analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 117, 102438. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102438 
  10. Havi, E. D. K. (2021). The Impact Of Exchange Rate Volatility on Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in Ghana. African Journal of Economic Review, 9(4), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.315820
  11. Huong, T. T. X., Linh N. T. M., & Lien, N. T. K. (2021). Exchange Rate Volatility and FDI Response during the Financial Crisis: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 0119–0126. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0119
  12. Ignatius, A. E., Ogbonna, A. A., & Anne C. M. (2019). Exchange Rate Volatility and Foreign Direct Investment: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Business and Economic Policy, 6(4), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.30845/jbep.v6n4p10
  13. IMF (2022). Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 2021, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C, USA.
  14. Jamal, A., & Bhat, G. M. (2022). Disentangling the Nexus Between Exchange Rate Volatility, Exports, and FDI: Empirical Evidence from the Indian Economy. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/09749101221108788
  15. Jeanneret, A. (2007). Foreign Direct Investment and Exchange Rate Volatility: A Nonlinear Story. Working Paper No. 399, Institut für schweizerisches Bankwesen, Universität Zürich. https://www.econbiz.de/10005858054
  16. Koop, G. (2003). Bayesian Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England. 
  17. Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan, 2nd edn, Elsevier, London, England. 
  18. Moraghen, W., Seetanah, B., & Sookia, N. U. H. (2020). The Impact of Exchange Rate and Exchange Rate Volatility on Mauritius Foreign Direct Investment: A Sector-Wise Analysis. International Journal of Finance and Economics. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2416 
  19. Nadine, A. E. A., Salah A., & Rashid N. (2021). The Impact of Relative Exchange Rate Volatility and Other Multidimensional Determinants on FDI in Egypt. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 11(12), 1163–1197. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2021.1112071
  20. Obstfeld, M., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2019). A Tie That Binds: Revisiting the Trilemma in Emerging Market Economies. Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 101(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00740
  21. Ramzan, M. (2021). Symmetric Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Foreign Direct Investment in Pakistan: Do The Global Financial Crises and Political Regimes Matter? Annals of Financial Economics, 16(4), 2250007. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495222500075 
  22. Rendon, S. R. (2012). Fixed and Random Effects in Classical and Bayesian Regression. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2012.00700.x
  23. Rhadbane, A. B. E., & Moudden, A. E. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic, Real Effective Exchange Rate and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: Evidence from Morocco, Turkey and Egypt. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 12(2), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v12i2.543
  24. Shetty, A., Manley, J., & Kyaw, N. (2019). The Impact of Exchange Rate Movements on Mergers and Acquisitions FDI. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 52-53, 100594. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.100594 
  25. Stata. (2023). Bayesian Analysis Reference Manual (Release 18). Available from: https://www.stata.com/bookstore/bayesian-analysis-reference-manual/ 
  26. Svirydzenka, K. (2016). Introducing a New Broad-based Index of Financial Development. IMF Working Paper No. 2016/005, 43, Washington D.C, USA. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2754950
  27. Taşdemir, F., & Özmen, E. 2018. Exchange Rate Regimes as Thresholds: The Main Determinants of Capital Inflows in Emerging Market Economies. ERC Working Papers in Economics, 18(10). https://www.econbiz.de/10011911181
  28. Tien, L. T., Duc, N. C., & Kieu, V. T. T. (2022). The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on FDI Inflows: A Bayesian Random-Effect Panel Data Model. In: Ngoc Thach, N., Kreinovich, V., Ha, D.T., Trung, N.D. (eds) Financial Econometrics: Bayesian Analysis, Quantum Uncertainty, and Related Topics. ECONVN 2022. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 427. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98689-6_32
  29. Vaart, A. W. van der (1998). 10.2 Bernstein–von Mises Theorem. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press. 
  30. Zerin, J. (2020). The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: Evidence from South Asia. International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, X(3), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijfirm/225
  31. Zerrin, K. (2018). The Relationship between Exchange Rate Volatility and Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey: Toda and Yamamoto Causality Analysis. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 8(4), 61–67. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/6565


The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on Foreign Direct Investment: The Bayes Approach

Abstract:

This research examined the effect of exchange rate volatility on foreign direct investment in a group of countries with soft pegged exchange rate regimes and a group of countries with floating exchange rate regimes. The study dataset covered 114 countries from 2000 to 2021. Bayesian “random-effects” model were used to estimate the empirical model and perform statistical inferences throughout the research. The impact of exchange rate volatility on foreign direct investment was mainly positive, with a high probability (94%-95%) in the group of countries with soft pegged exchange rate regimes. For countries with floating exchange rate regimes, the impact of exchange rate volatility on foreign direct investment was still positive but weaker than in the group of countries with soft pegged exchange rate regimes. The probability of a positive effect of exchange rate volatility ranged from 88% to 90%. Therefore, the production flexibility is more strongly supported than the risk aversion. The difference between the two exchange rate regimes is shown in the prevalence of the probability of a positive effect of exchange rate volatility.