Tóm tắt:

Tài liệu tham khảo:

1. Adegboye, A., Ojeka, S., & Adegboye, K. (2020) Corporate governance structure, Bank externalities and sensitivity of non-performing loans in Nigeria. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1-21.
2. Akwaa-Sekyi, E. K., Moreno, J., Miglietta, F., & Roncone, V. (2018). How does board characteristics and insider ownership affect non-performing loans (NPLS) in European banking? New trends in accounting and management, 14, 1-66.
3. Al-Magharem, A., Haat, M., Hashim, H., & Ismail, S. (2020). The impact of ownership structure and macroeconomic factors on credit risk: Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 15(3), 134-148.
4. Arellano, M., & Bond. S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
5. Backer, B. D., Caju, P, D., Emiris, M., & Van Nieuwenhuyze, C. (2015). Macroeconomic determinants of non-performing loans. Economic Review, 3, 47-65.
6. Balagobei, S. (2019). Corporate governance and non - performing loans: Evidence from listed banks in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Accounting & Business Finance, 5(1), 72-85.
7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2016). Prudential treatment of problem assets - Definitions of non-performing exposures and forbearance. Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.
8. Batten, J., & Vo, X. V. (2019). Determinants of bank profitability - Evidence from Vietnam. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(1), 1-12.
9. Boussaada, R., Ammari, A., & Arfa, N. B. (2018). Board characteristics and MENA banks' credit risk: A fuzzy-set analysis. Economics Bulletin, 38(4), 2284-2303
10. Chính phủ. (2012). Đề án cơ cấu lại hệ thống các tổ chức tín dụng giai đoạn 2011 - 2015. Hà Nội.
11. Doğan, B., & Ekşi, I. H. (2020). The effect of board of directors characteristics on risk and bank performance: Evidence from Turkey. Economics and Business Review, 6(20), 88-104.
12. Dong, Y., Girardone, C., & Kuo, J. M. (2016). Governance, efficiency and risk taking in Chinese banking. The British Accounting Review, 49(2), 211-229.
13. Duong, K. D., Vu, D. N., Le, K. D., & Nguyen, D. V. (2022). Do Political Connections and Bank Funding Diversity Increase NonPerforming Loans: New Evidence from the Bayesian Approach. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 18(4), 79-92.
14. Fernandes, C., Farinha, J., Martins, F. V., & Mateus, C. (2017). Supervisory boards, financial crisis and bank performance: Do board characteristics matter? Journal of Banking Regulation, 18, 310-337.
15. Gafoor, C. P., Mariappan, V., & Thyagarajan, S. (2018). Board characteristics and bank performance in India. IIMB Management Review, 30, 160-167.
16. Huỳnh Thị Hương Thảo. (2018). Ảnh hưởng của rủi ro tín dụng đến hiệu quả hoạt động của các ngân hàng thương mại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học & Đào tạo Ngân hàng, 202, 36-44.
17. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
18. IMF. (2005). The Treatment of Nonperforming Loans. Meeting of the Advisory Expert Group on National Accounts.
19. Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G. J., & Mathieu, R. (2003). Managerial incentives for income smoothing through bank loan loss provisions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20(1), 63-80.
20. Kaymak, T., & Bektas, E. (2008). East Meets West? Board Characteristics in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkish Banks. Corporate Governance, 16(6), 550-561.
21. Khan, M. A., Siddique, A., & Sarwar, Z. (2020). Determinants of non-performing loans in the banking sector in developing state. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 5(1), 135-145.
22. Laeven, L. (2013). Corporate governance: What’s special about banks? Annual Review of Financial Economics, 5(1), 63-92.
23. Mazreku, I., Morina, F., & Misiri, V., Spiteri, V. J., & Grima, S. (2018). Determinants of the Level of Non-Performing Loans in Commercial Banks of Transition Countries. European Research Studies Journal, 3, 3-13.
24. Masud, A. A., & Mamun, S. A. (2019). Firm-Characteristics, Corporate Governance and Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) of State-Owned Commercial Banks of Bangladesh. Southeast Business Review, 9(1&2), 1-18.
25. Nguyen, T. M. H. (2015). Non-Performing Loans: Affecting Factor for the Sustainability of Vietnam Commercial Banks. Journal of Economics and Development, 17(1), 93-106.
26. Nguyễn Thị Thiều Quang & Hà Xuân Thùy (2021). Vai trò của các yếu tố đặc điểm ngân hàng đến tỷ suất sinh lợi cổ phiếu trong giai đoạn COVID-19. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Kinh tế và Kinh doanh châu Á, 32(5),18-40.
27. Ngân hàng Nhà nước Việt Nam. (2014). Quyết định 22/VBHN-NHNN ngày 04 tháng 06 năm 2014 của Thống đốc NHNN Việt Nam ban hành quy định về phân loại nợ, trích lập và sử dụng dự phòng để xử lý rủi ro tín dụng trong hoạt động ngân hàng của tổ chức tín dụng. Hà Nội.
28. Nugraheni, P., & Muhammad, R. (2019). Board of directors and credit risk: An empirical study of Indonesian Islamic banks. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 23(4), 503-513.
29. Phạm Dương Phương Thảo & Nguyễn Linh Đan. (2018). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến tỷ lệ nợ xấu của các ngân hàng thương mại cổ phần Việt Nam. Tạp chí Chính sách & Thị trường Tài chính - Tiền tệ, 194, 1-10.
30. Switzer, L. N., & Wang, J. (2013). Default risk estimation, bank credit risk, and corporate governance. Financial Markets. Institutions & Instruments, 22(2), 91-112.
31. Tarchouna, A., Jarraya, B., & Bouri, A. (2021). Do board characteristics and ownership structure matter for bank non‑performing loans? Empirical evidence from US commercial banks. Journal of Management and Governance, 26, 479-518.
32. Yang, L., Sanjukta, B., & Agyenim, B. (2019). Impact of Ownership Structure and Ownership Concentration on Credit Risk of Chinese Commercial Banks. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 16(2), 253-272.

Abstract:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63065/ajeb.vn.2022.199.81417