Tạp chí đã xuất bản
2004
ISSN
ISSN 2615-9813
ISSN (số cũ) 1859-3682

SỐ 180 | THÁNG 3/2021

Mối quan hệ giữa sự gắn kết của sinh viên và giá trị dịch vụ cảm nhận: Vai trò trung gian của khả năng hấp thu

Nguyễn Thị Đoan Trân, Phạm Thị Nhã Phương

Tóm tắt:

Đây là một nghiên cứu thực nghiệm về vai trò trung gian của khả năng hấp thu trong mối quan hệ giữa sự gắn kết của sinh viên và giá trị dịch vụ cảm nhận (GTDVCN) bằng cách sử dụng mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính để phân tích các mối quan hệ trong mô hình nghiên cứu đề xuất với hai giả thuyết. Kết quả phân tích dữ liệu chính thức thu thập từ 2.075 sinh viên của năm trường đại học tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh và Hà Nội cho thấy, cả hai giả thuyết đều được chấp nhận. Trong đó, mối quan hệ tuyến tính là sự gắn kết của sinh viên tác động tích cực lên GTDVCN. Đồng thời, mô hình vai trò trung gian bán phần của khả năng hấp thu đối với mối quan hệ này được chấp nhận, là phù hợp hơn mô hình trung gian toàn phần bởi vì mức độ giải thích phương sai của GTDVCN cao hơn. Những phát hiện này có thể đóng góp vào lý thuyết nghiên cứu về sự gắn kết của sinh viên, GTDVCN và khả năng hấp thu.

 

Tài liệu tham khảo:

  1. Alves, H. (2011). The measurement of perceived value in higher education: a unidimensional approach. The Service Industries Journal, 31(12), 1943-1960.
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
  3. Barich, H., & Kotler, P. (1991). A framework for marketing image management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 32(2), 94-104.
  4. Caruana, A., Money, A. H., & Berthon, P. R. (2000). Service quality and satisfaction-the moderating role of value. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1339-1352.
  5. Christopher, M., Payne, A., & Ballantyne, D. (1991). Relationship marketing: bringing quality customer service and marketing together. London: Heinemann.
  6. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
  7. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88-108.
  8. Cronin Jr, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
  9. Doña-Toledo, L., Luque-Martínez, T., & Del Barrio-García, S. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of university perceived value, according to graduates: The moderating role of Higher Education involvement. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 14(4), 535-565.
  10. Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Newell, S., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 86-97.
  11. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  12. Fuller-Love, N. (2009). Formal and informal networks in small businesses in the media industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(3), 271-284.
  13. Gassenheimer, J. B., Houston, F. S., & Davis, J. C. (1998). The role of economic value, social value, and perceptions of fairness in interorganizational relationship retention decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 322-337.
  14. Gong, Y., Chang, S., & Cheung, S. Y. (2010). High performance work system and collective OCB: A collective social exchange perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 119-137.
  15. Gounaris, S. P., Tzempelikos, N. A., & Chatzipanagiotou, K. (2007). The relationships of customer-perceived value, satisfaction, loyalty and behavioral intentions. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 6(1), 63-87.
  16. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. In: Upper Saddle River. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  18. Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 164-174.
  19. Hu, H.-H., Kandampully, J., & Juwaheer, T. D. (2009). Relationships and impacts of service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and image: an empirical study. The Service Industries Journal, 29(2), 111-125.
  20. Huber, F., Herrmann, A., & Morgan, R. E. (2001). Gaining competitive advantage through customer value oriented management. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(1), 41-53.
  21. Jhandir, S. U. (2012). Customer satisfaction, perceived service quality and mediating role of perceived value. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(1), 68-76.
  22. Kirp, D. L., Kirp, D. L., Berman, E. P., Holman, J. T., Roberts, P., Solomon, D., & VanAntwerpen, J. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  23. Kousar, S., Zafar, M., Batool, S. A., & Ali, S. (2019). The mediating role of absorptive capacity in the relationship between intellectual capital and organizational innovation in higher education institutes Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 13(3), 656-679.
  24. Ladhari, R., & Morales, M. (2008). Perceived service quality, perceived value and recommendation. Library Management, 29(4/5), 352-366.
  25. Ladhari, R., Pons, F., Bressolles, G., & Zins, M. (2011). Culture and personal values: How they influence perceived service quality. Journal of Business Research, 64(9), 951-957.
  26. Lamborn, S., Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, 11-39. NY: Teachers College Press.
  27. LeBlanc, G., & Nguyen, N. (1999). Listening to the customer’s voice: examining perceived service value among business college students. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(4), 187-198.
  28. Ledden, L., Kalafatis, S. P., & Mathioudakis, A. (2011). The idiosyncratic behaviour of service quality, value, satisfaction, and intention to recommend in higher education: An empirical examination. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(11-12), 1232-1260.
  29. Liljander, V., & Strandvik, T. (1993). Estimating zones of tolerance in perceived service quality and perceived service value. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 4(2), 6-28.
  30. Lin, J., Hsiao, C. T., Glen, R., Pai, J. Y., & Zeng, S. H. (2014). Perceived service quality, perceived value, overall satisfaction and happiness of outlook for long‐term care institution residents. Health Expectations, 17(3), 311-320.
  31. Lo, A. S., & Wu, C. (2014). Effect of consumption emotion on hotel and resort spa experience. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31(8), 958-984.
  32. Mariano, S., & Walter, C. (2015). The construct of absorptive capacity in knowledge management and intellectual capital research: content and text analyses. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 372-400.
  33. Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 466-479.
  34. Maringe, F., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Marketing Higher Education, Theory and Practice. England: McGraw-Hill.
  35. Miller, K., McAdam, R., Moffett, S., Alexander, A., & Puthusserry, P. (2016). Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R&D Management, 46(2), 383-399.
  36. Mostafa, R. B. (2015). Engaging students via social media: is it worth the effort? Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 144-159.
  37. Muga, L., & Santamaria, R. (2010). Market penetration strategies and the fee–performance relationship: the case of Spanish money mutual funds. The Service Industries Journal, 30(9), 1529-1547.
  38. Nguyễn Đình Thọ (2013). Phương pháp nghiên cứu khoa học trong kinh doanh. Hà Nội: NXB Tài chính.
  39. Nguyễn Đình Thọ, Nguyễn Thị Mai Trang (2011). Nghiên cứu khoa học marketing - Ứng dụng mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính SEM (Vol. Lần 2). Hà Nội: NXB Lao động.
  40. Nicolescu, L. (2009). Applying marketing to higher education: Scope and limits. Management & Marketing, 4(2), 35-44.
  41. Nowak, R. (2018). Executive’S Personality And Group Performance: The Mediating Role Of Absorptive Capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(06), Retrieved from
  42.  https://search.proquest.com/docview/2104171912?accountid=2104163189.
  43. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (Vol. 3rd ed). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
  44. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). NY: Springer.
  45. Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (1994). Service Quality: Insights and Managerial Implications from the Frontier.. In Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice (pp. 1–19). Roland T. Rust and Richard L. Oliver (Eds.). New York: Sage Publications.
  46. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness: Guilford Publications.
  47. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
  48. Snoj, B., Korda, A. P., & Mumel, D. (2004). The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(3), 156-176.
  49. Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & Van Trijp, H. C. (1991). The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283-299.
  50. Tho, N. D. (2017). Knowledge transfer from business schools to business organizations: the roles absorptive capacity, learning motivation, acquired knowledge and job autonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1240-1253.
  51. Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1993). Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review, 71(1), 84-93.
  52. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139.
  53. Yusof, N., Ang, R. P., & Oei, T. P. S. (2017). The psychometric properties of the school engagement measure in adolescents in Singapore. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(5), 521-533.
  54. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
  55. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. 


The Relationship between Student Engagement and Perceived Service Value: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity

Abstract:

This empirical study proposes the mediating role of absorptive capacity in the relationship between student engagement and perceived service value employing official data collected from 2,075 students at five universities in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi. The research finds that student engagement positively effects perceived service value. At the same time, results show that absorptive capacity partially mediates the influence of student engagement on perceived service value, thus further contributing to the existing literature on student engagement, perceived service value, and absorptive capacity. By applying Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling to process the models with three latent variables and two hypotheses with respect to the linkages among these variables, the results indicate that both hypotheses are accepted at the significance level of less than 1%.