Tạp chí đã xuất bản
2004
ISSN
ISSN 2615-9813
ISSN (số cũ) 1859-3682

SỐ 217 | Tháng 4/2024

Tác động của hợp đồng phái sinh và sức mạnh thị trường đến hiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàng tại Việt Nam

Phạm Nhật Tuấn, Lê Vũ Hội, Dương Đăng Khoa

Tóm tắt:

Nghiên cứu này xem xét tác động của hợp đồng phái sinh (HĐPS) và sức mạnh thị trường (SMTT) đến hiệu quả hoạt động (HQHĐ) ngân hàng tại Việt Nam. Nhóm tác giả phân tích mẫu 25 ngân hàng thương mại (NHTM) Việt Nam giai đoạn 2010–2020 bằng mô hình tuyến tính tổng quát. Bài viết phát hiện ra rằng HQHĐ được cải thiện bằng cách sử dụng HĐPS. Hơn nữa, SMTT có tác động tích cực đến HQHĐ khi nó ở dưới mức tối ưu. Ngoài ra, kết quả xác nhận mối quan hệ phi tuyến tính giữa SMTT và HQHĐ ngân hàng. Những kết quả chính này vẫn vững chắc sau khi sử dụng phương pháp bình phương tối thiểu và nhất quán với lý thuyết Đa dạng và SMTT. Cuối cùng, những phát hiện này có giá trị thực tiễn đối với các nhà quản lý ngân hàng và cơ quan hoạch định chính sách trong việc điều hành hệ thống ngân hàng Việt Nam.

 

Tài liệu tham khảo:

  1. Ahamed, M. M. (2012). Market structure and performance of Bangladesh banking industry: A panel data analysis. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 1-18.
  2. Ahmed, R. (2021). A Study on the Impact of Derivatives on Bank Risk and Profitability. Available at SSRN 3799045.
  3. Alhassan, A., & Naka, A. (2020). Corporate future investments and stock liquidity: Evidence from emerging markets. International review of economics & finance, 65, 69-83.
  4. Ali, S., Shahzad, S. J. H., Raza, N., & Al-Yahyaee, K. H. (2018). Stock market efficiency: A comparative analysis of Islamic and conventional stock markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 503, 139-153. 
  5. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard business review, 35(5), 113-124.
  6. Ariss, R. T. (2010). On the implications of market power in banking: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of banking & Finance, 34(4), 765-775.
  7. Bonin, A., Taberlet, P., Miaud, C., & Pompanon, F. (2005). Explorative genome scan to detect candidate loci for adaptation along a gradient of altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Molecular biology and evolution, 23(4), 773-783. 
  8. Cai, W., Xu, F., & Zeng, C. (2016). Geographical diversification and bank performance: Evidence from China. Economics Letters, 147, 96-98.
  9. Calmès, C., & Théoret, R. (2010). The impact of off-balance-sheet activities on banks returns: An application of the ARCH-M to Canadian data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1719-1728.
  10. Caminal, R., & Matutes, C. (2002). Market power and banking failures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(9), 1341-1361. 
  11. Cuestas, J. C., Lucotte, Y., & Reigl, N. (2020). Banking sector concentration, competition and financial stability: the case of the Baltic countries. Post-Communist Economies, 32(2), 215-249.
  12. Chan, K., Ikenberry, D. L., & Lee, I. (2007). Do managers time the market? Evidence from open-market share repurchases. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(9), 2673-2694. 
  13. Chen, Y., Cheng, L., Lee, C. C., & Wang, C. S. (2021). The impact of regional banks on environmental pollution: Evidence from China's City commercial banks. Energy Economics, 102, 105492.
  14. Chernenko, S., & Faulkender, M. (2011). The two sides of derivatives usage: Hedging and speculating with interest rate swaps. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1727-1754.
  15. Christiansen, W. A., & Pace, D. R. (1994). Relaxing the Glass-Steagall Act: Do Diversification Benefits Exist. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 7(3), 55-62.
  16. Delis, M. D., Kokas, S., & Ongena, S. (2017). Bank market power and firm performance. Review of Finance, 21(1), 299-326. 
  17. Duong, K. D., Le Vu, H., Nguyen, D. V., & Pham, H. (2023a). How do employee stock ownership plans programs and ownership structure affect bank performance? Evidence from Vietnam. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(5), 2604-2614.
  18. Duong, K. D., Tran, P. M. D., & Pham, H. (2023b). CEO overpower and corporate social responsibility of commercial banks: The moderating role of state ownership. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2171609.
  19. Duong, K. D., Tran, P. M. D., Nguyen, P. Y. N., & Pham, H. (2023c). How do funding diversity and non-performing loans affect bank performance in different economic cycles? Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2215076.
  20. Duong, K. D., Truong, P. H., Van Nguyen, D., & Le, A. N. N. (2023d). The trilogy between CEO overpower, green credit, and core competence: Evidence from commercial banks in Vietnam. Heliyon, 9(10).
  21. Ebrahim, A., & Hasan, I. (2008). The value relevance of product diversification in commercial banks. Review of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 24-37.
  22. Fortin, R., Goldberg, G. M., & Roth, G. (2010). Bank risk taking at the onset of the current banking crisis. Financial Review, 45(4), 891-913.
  23. Heffernan, S. A., & Fu, X. (2010). Determinants of financial performance in Chinese banking. Applied Financial Economics, 20(20), 1585-1600. 
  24. Keffala, M. R. (2021). How using derivative instruments and purposes affects performance of Islamic banks? Evidence from CAMELS approach. Global Finance Journal, 50, 100520. 
  25. Kim, K. Y., & Patel, P. C. (2017). Employee ownership and firm performance: A variance decomposition analysis of European firms. Journal of Business Research, 70, 248-254. 
  26. Kok, S. K., & Shahgholian, A. (2023). The impact of proximity within elite corporate networks on the Shariah governance-firm performance nexus: Evidence from the global Shariah elite. Emerging Markets Review, 54, 100998.
  27. Khasawneh, A. Y., & Hassan, M. K. (2009). The risks of off-balance sheet derivatives in US commercial banks. Networks Financial Institute Working Paper. 
  28. Li, L., & Yu, Z. (2010). The impact of derivatives activity on commercial banks: Evidence from US bank holding companies. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 17, 303-322.
  29. Luo, Y., Tanna, S., & De Vita, G. (2016). Financial openness, risk and bank efficiency: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 24, 132-148. 
  30. Mulwa, J. M. (2018). Sectoral credit diversification, bank performance and monitoring effectiveness; a cross-country analysis of east African banking industries.
  31. Mulwa, J. M., Tarus, D., & Kosgei, D. (2015). Commercial bank diversification: a theoretical survey. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, 2(1), 45-49.
  32. Nguyen, M., Perera, S., & Skully, M. (2016). Bank market power, ownership, regional presence and revenue diversification: Evidence from Africa. Emerging Markets Review, 27, 36-62.
  33. Olson, D., & Zoubi, T. A. (2011). Efficiency and bank profitability in MENA countries. Emerging markets review, 12(2), 94-110.
  34. Osayi, V. I., Kasimu, A., & Nkwonta, H. C. (2018). Financial market derivatives and the performance of deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 6(11), 382-396.
  35. Owusu-Antwi, G. (2013). The Effect of Financial Restructuring on the Degree of Competition in the Banking Industry of Ghana. Nova Southeastern University.
  36. Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research. Strategic management journal, 21(2), 155-174.
  37. Pathan, S., & Skully, M. (2010). Endogenously structured boards of directors in banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1590-1606.
  38. Pham, M. D., Duong, T. K. H., & Duong, T. Q. N. (2017). Impact of Lerner Index, HHI Index, and opportunity cost of bank reserve on the net interest margin of commercial banks. Scientific Journal of Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 13(1), 3-19.
  39. Said, A. (2002). Does the Use of Derivatives Impact Bank Performance? A Case Study of Relative Performance During 2002-2009. A case study of relative performance during, 2009, 77-88.
  40. Schaumans, C., & Verboven, F. (2015). Entry and competition in differentiated products markets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 195-209.
  41. Shen, X., & Hartarska, V. (2013). Derivatives as risk management and performance of agricultural banks. Agricultural Finance Review, 73(2), 290-309. 
  42. Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 1(3), 223-247. 
  43. Tran, O. T. K., Nguyen, A. H. V., Nguyen, P. Y. N., & Duong, K. D. (2023). Ceo overpower and stock price crash risk: Evidence from family businesses in Vietnam. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 10(3), 425-438.
  44. Xuan, S. (2013). Financial Derivatives and Bank Performance. Auburn University.

 


Effects of Derivatives and Market Power on Bank Performance: Evidence from Vietnam

Abstract:

This research is a first attempt to investigate how market power and derivatives affect bank performance in Vietnam. We used Generalized Linear Models to examine a sample of 25 Vietnamese commercial banks between 2010 and 2020. Our findings show that utilizing derivatives empowers bank performance in Vietnam. Additionally, we discover that the performance of banks is positively but marginally impacted by market power. Furthermore, the results indicate that market power and bank performance have a non-linear connection. The main findings are robust after employing Robust Least Squares estimations. Our findings are consistent with the market power and diversity theories. Finally, bank managers and policymakers in Vietnam can use our findings to develop sustainable banking performance.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63065/ajeb.vn.2024.217.96091

Liên hệ
  • Cơ quan chủ quản: Trường Đại học Ngân hàng Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

    Cơ quan xuất bản: Tạp chí Kinh tế và Ngân hàng châu Á

  • Địa chỉ Tòa soạn: 36 Tôn Thất Đạm, Phường Nguyễn Thái Bình, Quận 1, TP.HCM, Việt Nam
  • Điện thoại: 028.38210238|Email: ajeb.vn@hub.edu.vn
  • Giấy phép trang thông tin điện tử: Số 201/GP-TTĐT do Cục Phát thanh, Truyền hình và Thông tin điện tử cấp ngày 11/11/2016
  • Giấy phép Hoạt động Tạp chí in: 388/GP-BTTTT ngày 02/11/2018 in tại Công ty TNHH Một Thành viên In Kinh tế
  • Tổng Biên tập: ..........................................................
Thể lệ tạp chí
Thống kê
  • 1.502 lượt truy cập
  • 25 trực tuyến
  • 206 Tạp chí đã được phát hành
  • 818 Bài viết được phát hành